The building is structured as a central organization, whose programmatic core is the auditorium, and which, mediated by a circulatory bellows, deploys leisure and educational programs on the perimeter. The public programs of general access deploys in the outer ring of the ground floor, towards the Rodrigo Bueno neighborhood, the access, the bar and the library, with semi-covered areas extend the programs to the exterior.
The exhibition areas, both covered and semi-covered, are located towards the Ecological Reserve. Located in the center of the building, the auditorium has a permeable perimeter enclosure system that can be opened expanding its spatiality, extending its interior to the spaces of the entrance hall, the library and the exhibition hall. This modality enhances the use of the auditorium and makes a dynamic space that supports multiple uses even more flexible and expandable.
The building generates series of expansions both on the ground floor and on the top floor. The expansions are understood as extensions of the quality of the interior space in semi-covered and uncovered spaces. In the case of the library, the expansion is the connection with the bar, giving the possibility of the appearance of a hybrid space where the activities of both programs can be integrated.
The building is structured as a central organization, whose programmatic core is the auditorium, and which, mediated by a circulatory bellows, deploys leisure and educational programs on the perimeter. The public programs of general access deploys in the outer ring of the ground floor, towards the Rodrigo Bueno neighborhood, the access, the bar and the library, with semi-covered areas extend the programs to the exterior.
The exhibition areas, both covered and semi-covered, are located towards the Ecological Reserve. Located in the center of the building, the auditorium has a permeable perimeter enclosure system that can be opened expanding its spatiality, extending its interior to the spaces of the entrance hall, the library and the exhibition hall. This modality enhances the use of the auditorium and makes a dynamic space that supports multiple uses even more flexible and expandable.
The building generates series of expansions both on the ground floor and on the top floor. The expansions are understood as extensions of the quality of the interior space in semi-covered and uncovered spaces. In the case of the library, the expansion is the connection with the bar, giving the possibility of the appearance of a hybrid space where the activities of both programs can be integrated.
1.0
2.0
Canon Extraño
Universidad Nacional de la Matanza
Departamento de Ingeniería e Investigaciones Técnicas
Carrera de Arquitectura
Forma 3 y 4
2020
Profesores Santiago Miret y Lucas Roldán
Estudiantes Lucas Pona Matías Varano, Facundo Sarmoria, María Eugenia Duca Florencia Leiva, Micaela Herbon, Julián Amaya, Gonzalo Cullari, Florencia Hernandez, Camila Raimunda Zugasti, Damián Cavalotto, Facundo Zito, Iara Gentile, Juan Ignacio Bellometi, Leandro Maciel, Andrea Samaniego, Abril Tossi, María Victoria Cavo, Agustina Caparrotta, Malen Carnovali, Vanesa Casco, Maia Heredia, Jessica Marques, Carolina Curto, Federico Lacaria, Oriel Tauss, Chirino Parra Miguel Andres, Ponomareff Tomas David, Rolero Aylen Nahir, Mastroianni Brenda Julieta, Mele Tamara Antonella, Perez Rodrigo Tomas, Castagnola Aixa Belén, Questa Agustina, Simonelli Maira Ailen, Aguirre Sandra Viviana, Bordazahar Jonatan Martin, Larroquette Maria Victoria, Orgambide Camila Aylen, Preiti María Camila, Tafuro Agustina Rosario, Almaraz Ruquet Lautaro Ivan, Heredia Villca Carlos Wilson, Ravnik Lucas Martin, Garcia Bottazzo Trinidad, Lukjanionok Sol Melina, Monteagudo Melany, Schenone Melina Mariela, Federico Solange Anabel, Meza Mareco Melisa, Duarte Santiago Federico, Ortiz María Eva y Flores Lopez Jessica Candela.
La Arquitectura, posiblemente más que cualquier otra disciplina, se ocupa del problema de la organización material. Esto es, el modo en el que elementos se disponen para construir organizaciones geométricas. La singularidad de estas organizaciones está definida por normativas que determinan los modos en los que el proyecto es potencialmente capaz de variar. La noción de canon que nos interesa no es aquella relacionada con la convención, esto es, no nos resulta relevante lo canónico por común acuerdo. Esta investigación se ocupa de lo canónico como la posibilidad de construir la singularidad en aquellas obras que trascienden a su época. Lo canónico como aquello que determina una problematización de lo que se considera constante.
Canon Extraño trabaja con proyectos que, sin necesariamente formar parte de las obras consagradas de la disciplina de la Arquitectura, presentan complejidades singulares. Las obras estudiadas no resultan canónicas por su fácil identificación, por su recurrente aparición en libros de historia o su premiada trayectoria, sino por emerger como organizaciones con una singularidad más sofisticada que trasciende su coyuntura y tiempo histórico. De este modo, se procura el estudio e intensificación de sus condiciones de singularidad, con el objeto de arribar a organizaciones donde esta singularidad canónica extraña sea explícita.